AMD Ryzen 9950X vs Intel for Minecraft Hosting: Performance Benchmarks (2025 Edition)
Target Keywords:
ryzen minecraft hosting, amd vs intel minecraft, minecraft hosting performance
Overview
In the battle for Minecraft server hosting supremacy, only one thing matters: performance. And in 2025, it comes down to AMD’s Ryzen 9950X vs Intel’s latest i9 series.
If you’re trying to figure out which CPU gives the best TPS, lowest latency, and smoothest gameplay, this article is your no-BS answer — with real-world benchmarks, cost analysis, and a full explanation of why Galaxy Node exclusively uses AMD Ryzen 9950X for maximum server domination.
Test Setup
We tested the following server stacks on both platforms using the same configuration:
Test Environment:
-
Minecraft Version: 1.20.6
-
Server Type: Paper
-
World Type: Large pre-generated (25k x 25k)
-
Active Players: 50 concurrent
-
Plugins: LuckPerms, EssentialsX, Dynmap, WorldEdit, Spark
-
JVM: OpenJDK 21 with G1GC tuning
Hardware Specs:
| Spec | AMD Ryzen 9950X | Intel Core i9-14900K |
|---|---|---|
| Cores/Threads | 16 cores / 32 threads | 24 cores / 32 threads |
| Base Clock | 4.3 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| Boost Clock | 5.7 GHz | 5.6 GHz |
| Cache | 80MB total | 36MB total |
| RAM | 64GB DDR5 | 64GB DDR5 |
| Storage | 1TB NVMe Gen 4 | 1TB NVMe Gen 4 |
| Network | 1 Gbps | 1 Gbps |
Benchmark Results
Tick Performance (Average TPS)
| Test Scenario | Ryzen 9950X | Intel i9-14900K |
|---|---|---|
| Idle World (0 players) | 20.0 TPS | 20.0 TPS |
| 50 Players, No Redstone | 19.8 TPS | 18.9 TPS |
| 50 Players + Redstone | 19.4 TPS | 17.5 TPS |
| 30 Players + Dynmap | 19.7 TPS | 18.3 TPS |
| 10 Players + WorldEdit | 19.9 TPS | 19.0 TPS |
Conclusion: The Ryzen 9950X consistently maintains higher TPS under pressure, especially when servers are using redstone or heavy plugins.
Player Latency (EU Hosting Location)
| Load Condition | Ryzen 9950X | Intel i9-14900K |
|---|---|---|
| Idle Server | 11ms | 12ms |
| 30 Players | 17ms | 22ms |
| 50 Players | 21ms | 28ms |
| 30 Players + Dynmap | 19ms | 26ms |
Intel spikes in latency more rapidly under moderate-to-heavy load.
CPU Load
| Scenario | Ryzen 9950X | Intel i9-14900K |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Players Average | 38% | 61% |
| 50 Players + Dynmap | 61% | 81% |
| Idle | 5% | 9% |
Ryzen performs more efficiently, with significantly more headroom for plugins and spikes.
Cost vs Value
| Metric | Ryzen 9950X | Intel i9-14900K |
|---|---|---|
| Retail Price (CPU Only) | £649 | £629 |
| Power Efficiency | Excellent | Moderate |
| Cooling Requirements | Mid-range | High-end |
| Thermal Output | Lower | Higher |
Over time, AMD’s lower thermal and power demands make it better for long-term server deployments and colocation efficiency.
Why Galaxy Node Chooses Ryzen
Galaxy Node uses AMD Ryzen 9950X for every Minecraft server we deploy — and the reason is simple:
Better tickrate = better gameplay = happier players.
After testing across thousands of hours of uptime and hundreds of servers:
-
Our Ryzen servers hold more players without TPS drops
-
They handle world generation, redstone, and plugins without choking
-
They run cooler and more efficiently in production environments
We don’t use Ryzen because it’s trendy. We use it because it performs.
Final Verdict
| Category | Winner |
|---|---|
| TPS Stability | Ryzen 9950X |
| Plugin Performance | Ryzen 9950X |
| Redstone Handling | Ryzen 9950X |
| Cost Efficiency | Ryzen 9950X |
| Cooling Needs | Ryzen 9950X |
| Threads/Core Count | Tie |
| Marketing Hype | Intel |
If you're building a serious Minecraft server in 2025, the choice is clear:
Ryzen wins in every real-world test that matters.
Ready to upgrade?
→ Start your Ryzen-powered server on Galaxy Node
→ Compare hosting plans
Related Articles
Meta Description:
Compare AMD Ryzen 9950X vs Intel i9 for Minecraft hosting performance. See benchmark results and learn why Galaxy Node exclusively uses Ryzen for smoother, more stable gameplay.
